Only 2 of 4 factors can be computed from what this company has published, covering 50% of the score's weight. A composite below 60% coverage is withheld rather than shown with the gaps treated as passes.
Promise deliveryNot availableNo guided milestone has been reached yet, so there is nothing to score.35%
Evidence quality15 of 22 confirmed30%
Timeline stability7 held20%
FinancingNot availableFinancing is not disclosed as a project milestone.15%
A stage is marked complete when any of TeraWulf's
4 tracked projects has reached it —
this is the furthest the company has got anywhere, not the state of every site.
Open a stage to see which sites evidence it.
Capacity truthFour different measurements
⌁Not disclosedSecuredN/ANothing published to derive from
§839 MWContractedCritical IT
▣102 MWEnergisedCritical IT
$102 MWBillingCritical IT
These are four separate disclosures on different bases, not four stages of one
funnel. Secured power is measured at the utility connection; the rest are critical IT. They are
never subtracted from one another.
Revenue calculatorWhat billing capacity implies, and what it would be worth
The megawatts and the revenue rate come from what TeraWulf has published.
The multiple does not — it is an opinion, and it is the input that moves the answer most.
Nothing here is a price target.
Every option above is measured as critical IT, the same basis the
revenue rate is derived on. Secured power is deliberately absent: it is gross power at the
utility connection, and applying a per-MW contract rate to it would price megawatts that cannot
be sold as compute.
MW
Disclosed by the company
$m
Derived from WULF’s own contracts
Anthropic (Justified Data Campus): $19bn ÷ 401 MW ÷ 20 years = $2.37m per MW per year
×
An opinion — not a disclosure
m
Fetching from the provider…
Run-rate revenue—
Implied enterprise value—
Enterprise value per share—
Against the live price—
How much of that is the multiple
EV / revenue
Enterprise value
Per share
vs price
TeraWulf at a glance
Every figure below is sourced
TeraWulf develops powered data-centre campuses and leases them to compute tenants under long-term agreements, rather than owning the accelerators itself.
◇Powered shell●Reached: Invoicing
How far it has actually got
Select a step for its evidence
Muskie (Kentucky)
No evidence recorded yet
Lake Mariner, New York · 2026-06-30
Lake Mariner, New York
No evidence recorded yet
Lake Mariner, New York · 2026-06-30
Where the power goes
Each bar is drawn to the same scale. A dashed row means the company has not published
that figure — it is not zero. Where the dashed line appears, the measurement itself changes from
power at the utility connection to usable capacity inside the hall, so the step down is a change
of definition rather than capacity going missing.
What it owns, and what the customer brings
The company owns grid power, the building and the racks. The tenant supplies its own accelerators and sells its own compute.
Where it operates
4 recorded sites
🇺🇸4
A filled dot is a site with a published capacity figure; an outlined dot is a
site named in filings without one. Positions are schematic, not geographic.
Capacity record
Every value with its evidence
Measure
Value and evidence
Secured powerPower capacity controlled through executed utility, interconnection, energy-service, lease or comparable arrangements. It may include capacity already operating as well as capacity awaiting development. Secured power indicates supply control, not customer demand or completed compute capacity.
Not disclosed—Not disclosedEvidence
The 2.2 GW owned pipeline and 642.5 MW contracted figures were February 2026 disclosures and are retained as historical events rather than current values. No comparable current secured-power total on a single basis has been located.
Verified
Not verified
Type
Actual
Coverage
Not exhaustive — may be higher
Development pipelineIdentified development opportunity that is not yet secured — sites under study, options, and applications lodged. Reported separately from secured power and never added to it.
Not disclosed—Not disclosed
Customer-contractedCompute or capacity a paying customer has committed to under a signed contract. Demand, not supply. Frequently disclosed only for individual named contracts, in which case the site total is a disclosed minimum rather than an exhaustive figure.
Lake Mariner 438 MW (102 MW revenue-generating plus 336 MW under construction) and Anthropic/Justified approximately 401 MW. A disclosed minimum — the company has not published an updated exhaustive contracted total.
Approximately 401 MW of critical IT capacity under a 20-year initial lease term, approximately $19bn of contracted revenue over the initial term. Initial capacity expected in H2 2027 with full delivery expected in early 2028. Sale of TeraWulf's 50.1% interest in the Abernathy joint venture.
Under constructionCapacity with physical construction under way. Capital committed, no revenue from it yet.
Lake Mariner: 102 MW of revenue-generating critical IT capacity, with a further 336 MW of critical IT under construction.
Energised critical ITCritical IT load live and drawing power. Often described by companies as "active" or "operational" capacity. It does not by itself mean a customer is paying for it.
Lake Mariner: 102 MW of revenue-generating critical IT capacity, with a further 336 MW of critical IT under construction.
Customer-acceptedCapacity formally accepted under the relevant customer agreement. Acceptance may trigger billing or revenue recognition, but the commercial effect is contract-specific and must be separately evidenced.
Not disclosed—Not disclosed
Revenue liveCapacity for which the company has explicitly disclosed that billing, rent commencement or revenue generation has begun. Billing, GAAP revenue recognition and cash receipt are not assumed to occur simultaneously.
Muskie: up to 1 GW of contracted electric service. Chesapeake: approximately 210 MW of operational generation with potential future campus scale of up to 1 GW.
Muskie: up to 1 GW of contracted electric service. Chesapeake: approximately 210 MW of operational generation with potential future campus scale of up to 1 GW.
Projects and gates
4 recorded
Gates advance independently. Zoning can be granted while environmental approval,
financing and interconnection all remain outstanding — a single stage label would hide that.
Lake Mariner, New York
United States
438 MWCritical IT●Confirmed
102 MW revenue-generating critical IT plus 336 MW additional critical IT under construction across CB-4 and CB-5. CB-3 delivery completed in early July 2026.
—Site controlNot disclosed
—Utility agreementNot disclosed
—Interconnection approvedNot disclosed
—Zoning approvedNot disclosed
—Regulatory approvalNot disclosed
—Environmental approvalNot disclosed
—Building permitsNot disclosed
—Financing committedNot disclosed
—Long-lead equipment orderedNot disclosed
◐Construction startedIn progress · 1 source
●Utility energisedComplete · 1 source
●Critical IT energisedComplete · 1 source30 Jun 2026
●Customer contractedComplete · 1 source
—Customer acceptedNot disclosed
●Billing / revenue commencedComplete · 1 source30 Jun 2026
Critical IT energisedCB-5
Target Q1 2027ActualNot disclosed
○Not yet reached
CB-5: "targeted to begin phased delivery in early 2027". Recorded as Q1 as the narrowest defensible reading of "early".
Approximately 401 MW critical IT on a 20-year initial lease, approximately $19bn contracted revenue over the initial term. Initial capacity expected H2 2027, full delivery early 2028.
—Site controlNot disclosed
—Utility agreementNot disclosed
—Interconnection approvedNot disclosed
—Zoning approvedNot disclosed
—Regulatory approvalNot disclosed
—Environmental approvalNot disclosed
—Building permitsNot disclosed
—Financing committedNot disclosed
—Long-lead equipment orderedNot disclosed
—Construction startedNot disclosed
—Utility energisedNot disclosed
○Critical IT energisedNot started
●Customer contractedComplete · 1 source4 Aug 2026
○Customer acceptedNot started
○Billing / revenue commencedNot started
Critical IT energised
Target H2 2027ActualNot disclosed
○Not yet reached
"Initial delivery expected in the second half of 2027".
Up to 1 GW of contracted electric service via Kentucky Power Company. This is power availability at the utility, not customer-contracted critical IT, and is excluded from contracted-capacity totals.
●Site controlComplete · 1 source
●Utility agreementComplete · 1 source
—Interconnection approvedNot disclosed
—Zoning approvedNot disclosed
—Regulatory approvalNot disclosed
—Environmental approvalNot disclosed
—Building permitsNot disclosed
—Financing committedNot disclosed
—Long-lead equipment orderedNot disclosed
○Construction startedNot started
—Utility energisedNot disclosed
—Critical IT energisedNot disclosed
—Customer contractedNot disclosed
—Customer acceptedNot disclosed
—Billing / revenue commencedNot disclosed
Critical IT energised
Target Q4 2028ActualNot disclosed
○Not yet reached
"Initial service expected in the fourth quarter of 2028".
Approximately 210 MW operational generation at the Morgantown Generating Station. A further campus scale of up to 1 GW is potential only and is not current critical IT.
Committed value and conditional maximum are shown apart and never added. Where a
company discloses a ceiling — "up to" — the difference depends on events that have not happened.
Contract detail
Every disclosed field
Scroll sideways for all columns →
Customer
MW
Term
Value
Delivered
Terms
Anthropic (Justified Data Campus)
401 MWCritical IT
20 yr
$19bn
Not disclosed
20-year initial lease term. Initial capacity expected H2 2027, full delivery expected early 2028.↗ investors.terawulf.com
Verified changes
4 events
30 Jun 2026announced 11 Aug 2026
Lake Mariner reports 102 MW of revenue-generating critical IT, with 336 MW more under construction.
One of only two revenue-generating critical IT figures disclosed by any tracked company. The company's explicit "revenue-generating" wording is what allows this to be recorded as revenue-live.
Anthropic lease at the Justified Data Campus — approximately 401 MW critical IT, 20-year initial term, approximately $19bn.
Nearly doubles disclosed contracted capacity, but initial capacity is not expected until H2 2027 and full delivery not until early 2028. Contracted is not delivered.
Sale of TeraWulf's 50.1% interest in the Abernathy joint venture to Fluidstack.
Capacity disposed of must leave current owned totals. This is one reason the February 2.2 GW pipeline figure is retained as historical rather than carried forward as a current value.
FERC authorised the acquisition of Morgantown Power LLC (Docket EC26-58-000).
The first regulator-sourced record on the site, and a useful warning about headline approvals: FERC states the order covers the ownership transfer only. Data centre development, new generation, gas infrastructure, battery storage and any change to PJM participation each require separate review. Company guidance still contemplates data centre operations only in 2030.
First tranche of the approximately 401 MW Anthropic lease. Company guidance is H2 2027 — a half-year window, not a date. Would be the first energisation at the Justified campus.
Completion of the approximately 401 MW lease. Guided to early 2028. Full delivery would take TeraWulf's contracted capacity toward acceptance and, contract terms permitting, revenue.
Write down what you expect TeraWulf to deliver, and by when. T2C scores it
later against the same evidenced gates it uses everywhere else — not against the share price.
Stored in this browser only. Clearing your browser data deletes it, and T2C
never receives it — there is nowhere for it to be sent.
About TeraWulf
Last verified 15 Aug 2026
TeraWulf develops powered data-centre campuses and leases them to compute tenants under long-term agreements, rather than owning the accelerators itself.
TeraWulf converts sites with strong power positions into data-centre capacity and leases that capacity to customers on long terms. Its Lake Mariner campus in New York is generating revenue, and a very large lease at its Justified campus does not begin delivering until the second half of 2027 — the gap between contracted and delivered is the central question for the company.
Company facts
Legal name
TeraWulf Inc.
Ticker / exchange
WULF · NASDAQ
Founded
2021
Headquarters
Easton, Maryland, United States
Business model
Powered shell
Last verified
15 Aug 2026
Who leads it
Paul B. Prager
Co-Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
In role since 1 Feb 2021
Co-founder of TeraWulf, serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since February 2021. Previously founded and led Beowulf Electricity & Data.
Powered campus development on owned and acquired sites
Power generation assets supporting those campuses
How it makes money
Leases powered, cooled space; the tenant supplies its own accelerators where the lease says so. Earns a few million per megawatt per year rather than tens, with correspondingly lower capital cost.
Where it operates
United States (New York, Maryland, Kentucky)
Operating presence as disclosed. This is not the same as future pipeline —
a named location may hold nothing but secured power.
Publicly disclosed customers
Anthropic
Only customers the company has named publicly. Several tracked companies
describe counterparties only as "investment-grade hyperscaler", and those are not guessed at here.
Approximately 401 MW of critical IT capacity under a 20-year initial lease term, approximately $19bn of contracted revenue over the initial term. Initial capacity expected in H2 2027 with full delivery expected in early 2028. Sale of TeraWulf's 50.1% interest in the Abernathy joint venture.
Muskie: up to 1 GW of contracted electric service. Chesapeake: approximately 210 MW of operational generation with potential future campus scale of up to 1 GW.