My watchlist
Updating…
Data
Checking the feed…
You
My watchlist
Display
Estimates are derived by T2C from disclosed figures. Switch them off to see only what companies have published.
Focus mode Supporting context hidden. Figures, their basis, confidence and sources are unchanged — nothing that qualifies a number is hidden.

Explainers

What the words mean, why the distinctions matter, and how a promise becomes revenue. No prior knowledge assumed.

For newcomers Definitions from the data model
Illustrative cutaway showing electricity, cooling, servers, networking and customer delivery in an AI data centre

60-second explainer

How an AI data centre makes money

  1. Electricity reaches the site.
  2. Cooling and power systems support the computing equipment.
  3. Servers run customer workloads.
  4. The customer tests and accepts the contracted deployment.
  5. Revenue begins when the contract's billing conditions are met and disclosed.

Step 1 of 5. Press start to step through.

Acceptance and billing are different stages. T2C does not assume one proves the other.

Educational illustration; stages and architecture vary by project.

A megawatt is not a megawatt

Three different quantities

The most common error in AI infrastructure coverage is treating these as interchangeable. They are separate fields in the data, they are never added together, and the build fails if an aggregate mixes them.

Gross utility power

Power contracted at the utility connection, before conversion, cooling and distribution losses. The largest number a company can quote, and the least indicative of compute delivered.

Critical IT load

Power available to IT equipment inside the hall. The industry's comparable measure of usable data-centre capacity, and typically well below the gross utility figure for the same site.

GPU load

Power drawn by accelerators specifically, excluding other IT and infrastructure load.

Actual, minimum, target, pipeline, potential

What kind of number it is

A 5 GW ambition and a 1.5 GW operating figure are not the same kind of claim. Only the first two below ever enter a current-capacity total.

Actualcounted

A current, operating figure as at the stated date.

Disclosed minimumcounted

At least this much, from the components the company has itemised. The company has not published an exhaustive total, so the real figure may be higher.

Targetexcluded

A management goal for a future date. An intention, not a capability that exists today, and never counted in a current-capacity total.

Pipelineexcluded

Identified development opportunity — sites under study, options held, applications lodged. Not secured and not built.

Potentialexcluded

A theoretical ceiling, typically phrased "up to". Conditional on approvals, financing and demand that do not yet exist.

How well evidenced is it?

Four confidence levels

Every figure on this site carries one of these, and the level decides whether it can enter a total at all.

Confirmed

Stated in a primary document — an SEC filing, an official investor-relations release, a shareholder letter, or a regulator/utility record — and that document is linked.

Reported

Attributed to the company but read second-hand, or carried over from an earlier compile whose original document is not linked. News can put a figure here; it can never make one confirmed.

Estimated

Derived rather than disclosed. Shown separately from confirmed figures, with the derivation stated, and never included in a confirmed total.

Not disclosed

The company has not published this figure. It is stored as null and is never treated as zero.

Where to go next