Sites
Every project tracked at the level its milestones are actually evidenced — one record per site, with the gates it has passed and the documents that prove each one.
Schematic. The illustration is generic campus artwork and the pin positions are drawing coordinates — they are not geographic, and no tracked company publishes site coordinates. Tap a pin to open its site. Each pin opens the real site record behind it.
Delta Forge 1
🇺🇸 United States300 MW leased to a high investment-grade hyperscaler, approximately $7.5bn over a 15-year initial term.
Delta Forge 2
🇺🇸 United States210 MW leased to a high investment-grade hyperscaler, approximately $5.2bn over a 15-year initial term.
Polaris Forge 1
🇺🇸 United States400 MW leased to CoreWeave, approximately $11bn over a 15-year initial term.
Polaris Forge 2
🇺🇸 United States200 MW leased to an investment-grade hyperscaler, approximately $5bn over a 15-year initial term.
Polaris Forge 3
🇺🇸 United States300 MW leased to a high investment-grade hyperscaler, approximately $7.5bn over a 15-year initial term.
US data centre estate
🇺🇸 United StatesCoreWeave reports fleet-wide rather than per site; the site-level split is not disclosed.
British Columbia sites
🇨🇦 CanadaLegacy capacity converting to GPU use.
Bundey, South Australia
🇦🇺 AustraliaPart of the 5 GW secured portfolio.
Childress, Texas
🇺🇸 United StatesHosts the Microsoft Horizon tranches and the NVIDIA deployment.
Horizon 1 (Childress)
🇺🇸 United StatesDelivered to and accepted by Microsoft on 13 August 2026.
Horizons 2–4 (Childress)
🇺🇸 United StatesRemaining Microsoft tranches — the balance of the 200 MW contract after Horizon 1's 50 MW.
Spain
🇪🇸 SpainPart of the 5 GW secured portfolio.
Moses Lake, Washington
🇺🇸 United States18 MW gross project capacity.
Panther Creek, Pennsylvania
🇺🇸 United States350 MW contracted firm power, of which 60 MW is currently energised.
Scrubgrass, Pennsylvania
🇺🇸 United StatesCORRECTION: previously shown as 1.3 GW of secured capacity.
Sharon, Pennsylvania
🇺🇸 United States110 MW gross total site capacity: 30 MW existing energised utility capacity plus 80 MW under an energy-services agreement with associated substation…
Sherbrooke, Québec
🇨🇦 Canada96 MW under a conditional transfer and operation agreement.
Kansas City, Missouri
🇺🇸 United StatesUS campus build-out.
Mäntsälä, Finland
🇫🇮 FinlandCORRECTION: 310 MW is the capacity this facility is expected to reach when fully deployed — planned project capacity, not capacity energised today.
Chesapeake (Maryland)
🇺🇸 United StatesApproximately 210 MW operational generation at the Morgantown Generating Station.
Justified Data Campus (Anthropic)
🇺🇸 United StatesApproximately 401 MW critical IT on a 20-year initial lease, approximately $19bn contracted revenue over the initial term.
Lake Mariner, New York
🇺🇸 United States102 MW revenue-generating critical IT plus 336 MW additional critical IT under construction across CB-4 and CB-5.
Muskie (Kentucky)
🇺🇸 United StatesUp to 1 GW of contracted electric service via Kentucky Power Company.
Capacity figures state what they measure, and half this estate quotes gross power at the fence while the other half quotes critical IT in the hall. Where a site publishes only a gross figure, the comparable critical IT load is shown beneath it in amber as a T2C estimate — gross ÷ 1.4 — so the list can be read down one column. A site showing Not disclosed has published nothing to derive from: it is never shown as zero and never filled with a peer average. How estimates work.